Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Check your email for a verification code and enter it below.Don't close this box or you must fill out this form again.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
newtboy
(Member Profile)
Thanks!
*doublepromote
JiggaJonson
(Member Profile)
Thanks for the promote!
*promote
Man Harassed By Fox News Simply Tells Them The Truth
If you want unbiased news, you could assess several different news sources (nobody can assess them all) for their reliability and dedication to telling true stories. After that, only go to the sources that proved themselves before, and continue assessing them for reliability. Clearly Fox News is all about misinformation from blowhards who value appearing correct above being correct. Right there, O'Reilly ended with an ad hominem. So no, Fox News could never, ever be in the mix if someone wanted an unbiased source of news.
As I see it, if you truly want unbiased news (in English, from an American perspective), you need to consume everything on Fox News, MSNBC, NPR/PBS, the BBC World Service, and Al Jazeera, and then make up your own mind based on all those sources. You could probably throw in a few more, but since that's all too much anyways, I concede that there is actually no unbiased news available. Of course, Fox and MSNBC are blatantly biased, and at least NPR, the BBC and Al Jazeera try not to be.
How they censor Womens Sport Events on Iranian TV
Don't feed the troll. They thrive on attention. You've doubled his comments in this thread by answering.
Troll, troll, troll, troll, troll.
That is the extent of your contributions here. You've never had a positive thing to say about or on the sift.
It begs the question, why are you spending all of your free time here?
Apparent answer: Because you love to play the smarmy troll...maybe it's the one thing you're good at?
theali
(Member Profile)
Thanks for the quality!
*quality
$91,000 Wheel of Fortune Answer
Impressive, but how is this a $91,000 answer?
"Tonight Show Celebrity Photobomb"
I would have liked to see their reactions later when they looked at the photos and realized who had been behind them. Better than just being discovered.
Real Time with Bill Maher: 2016 Billionaire Buyers Guide
I think @lantern53 is right. How are you backing that up?
True enough, but more of them buy republicans than buy democrats. They're cheaper, more willing to be bought, more willing to say any crazy thing they're paid to say, and they stay bought longer. I can't say I blame Billionaires for buying mostly republicans when I think about it, but I can blame republicans for being so blatantly for sale.
Real Time with Bill Maher: 2016 Billionaire Buyers Guide
Except for meaningful stats about the economy. Pick an economic indicator and see under which presidents it did better, on average. The big ones all go to Democrats.
Let's all vote for Democrats...they have the best intentions, even though everything they touch turns to shit.
Real Time with Bill Maher: 2016 Billionaire Buyers Guide
Bob's at least correct that billionaires on both sides buy candidates. All presidential candidates are owned by billionaires.
Bob,
What color is the sky in your universe? I'm curious, because we obviously live in different planets or planes of existence.
You really need to stop getting your information from right wing nutjobs. They mislead you at every turn, obvious from your comments. I disagree with every single 'point' you made, and your numbers are silly, because they completely, intentionally ignore super PACs which is what Republicans used for funding, and also claims some people gave $74million directly to the democratic party/candidates, which is completely illegal and didn't happen.
Fail.
Real Time with Bill Maher: 2016 Billionaire Buyers Guide
Fat jokes? Really Bill?
In Osaka Japan its all in your head
What? 8,000+ views over nearly 6 years, and not one comment about the missing apostrophe in the title? Faith in the Sift dropping...
Transformers: The Very First Episode
I've found unedited parts 2 and 3 of this episode, but not the rest.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=USOAqatiIvY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zavwGTf9doY
Transformers: The Very First Episode
*length=00:05:01
Not sure if this is the same as the original, which was so old it didn't have its length indicated.
Transformers: The Very First Episode
*dead