>> ^Winstonfield_Pennypacker: That being said - I find a large degree of irony here. Aren't atheists always the ones saying that there shouldn't be public displays of belief - and that anything that even HINTS at a person's belief system is 'insensitive' and 'inappropriate'? And aren't religious groups the ones who are always saying that they should be able to have access to public displays?
Honestly, I don't watch much MSNBC, but I'm not sure that they're biased. I can certainly agree that Olbermann is biased. He's basically the opposite of Bill O'Reilly. Rachel Maddow is of course also biased. But then as John Stuart pointed out, MSNBC's morning show is hosted by a conservative. MSNBC is probably overall biased, but they're less than half as biased as Fox News. Fox News has reached the level of insanity.
It's interesting to see the reaction of Scientologists when they're asked about this. They almost all deny it publicly. Journalists really shouldn't let them get away with it. It's universally reported to exist by ex-scientologists who have reached the training level, it's come up in public court documents, and it's seen in copies of L Ron Hubbard's notes.
In the past, the Scientology celebrity center had a nice african women as a public spokesperson. She would deny all the claims about Xenu whenever she was asked about it. But someone eventually figured out that she was not even at the training level of operating thetan. You only learn about Xenu at operating thetan level 3. So sometimes even their public speakers don't really know anything about the church.
In Tommy Davis's case, I'm pretty sure he knows about Xenu. According to wikipedia, he's both denied it in the past, and also referenced Xenu's existence. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_W._Davis
Greatest Hits of the 1stTube Channel
Pole dance ruins wedding
Godless Billboard Moved After Threats
That being said - I find a large degree of irony here. Aren't atheists always the ones saying that there shouldn't be public displays of belief - and that anything that even HINTS at a person's belief system is 'insensitive' and 'inappropriate'? And aren't religious groups the ones who are always saying that they should be able to have access to public displays?
No.
Yet Another *Asia *WTF *Sexuality Video...
Larry King: Carrie Prejean Takes Off Microphone
Steven Seagal: Lawman on A&E
Baby Maddie doesn't want the public option!
"I eat stickers all the time, dude!" (IASIP)
Good For Your Heart, Good For Your Penis
TDS: For Fox Sake! - 10/29/09
New, full trailer for Avatar!
Real yoga teacher, a creepy pedophile, or brilliant comedy?
http://www.videosift.com/video/Hippie-Weirdo-Yoga-Farmers
Scientology Rep. Can't Handle the Heat On Xenu, Storms Out
In the past, the Scientology celebrity center had a nice african women as a public spokesperson. She would deny all the claims about Xenu whenever she was asked about it. But someone eventually figured out that she was not even at the training level of operating thetan. You only learn about Xenu at operating thetan level 3. So sometimes even their public speakers don't really know anything about the church.
In Tommy Davis's case, I'm pretty sure he knows about Xenu. According to wikipedia, he's both denied it in the past, and also referenced Xenu's existence.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_W._Davis